Hi Diri,
Spas, thanks for the welcoming! I sure will participate in discussions
Ok, back to the topic, see my inserts:
Okey - so what you are saying is that we haven't provided any proof of the phenomenon? It is quite obvious- isn't it?
No, what I am saying is that this is not a phenomenon but rather the way it has been for centuries, millenium ifnot fopr ever, on the other hand, the "stick like" figure is the new phenomenon and this is only true in the west. If you go anywhere else, "bigger" or what is really healthier women are the norm...even though it is changing slowly due to our global medias (internet, tv, magazine etc...).
No but back to the points: We are a poeple with a long and rich tradition. Kurds have always respected women and held them as important and through history you can see that they have had great influence on Kurdish culture, dailylife, religion and way of thinking... the mother was the sole teacher and source of wisdom in a child - She brought up her children with oral traditions from her mother and so on... If you look at Êzdî Kurds - you will see that respect and prominence... the man rarely had any real direct influence on the child before it was into the teenages... And this if the child was a boy. Kurdish culture has been held alive by our mothers and their mothers... Naturally this gives alot of respect and strenght to women in Kurdish society.
In Kurdish society a strong and "big" woman was a good thing because of the hard and robust lifestyle the Kurds had... Nothing was easy to do- washing, raising a child, feeding the family etc. the man and woman in Kurdish Society have been given two different roles- but each of them involve great responsibility... One was the caring and the other the provider...
Well, I agree and disagree with that, I understand what you are trying to say:
"the kurdsih Woman has been and is very important to the kurdish culture" and I TOTALLY agree with that.
But what we are doing here is a romantization of the dynamics.
I do agree that women looked after the kids and raised them, however, they hell didn't sit back at home while the men were out "hunting".
They had to go to the field with the men and do more than our "fathers" did. So I don't really buy and agree with the "care taker" versus "provider".
The truth is that we've had and we have a very patriarchal culture (and not only ours, this is world-wide). What about seeing a woman face in our kurdish political life (I know I know we've seen some, but they are all kept at some specifics positions like "women affais" or "education"...).
I'd like to see one as the head of the peshmergha like the guerilla in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan...now may be there are, just don't know.
What are you gonna tell us about Kiras û Fîstan Dilshad?
Well, the dress code is I doubt only meant to look bigger. First, the picture you showed, I don't know where it was taken, was it taken before a wedding? In fall when it is cold (and therefore need a lot of clothes)...
You see what I mean...
Anyways, clothes culture has developped to accomodate the climate, the culture and of course "trying" to be practical. You wouldn't see a Kurdish man with a pair of jeans in the middle of the summer, however, you would see one with a Shal u Shapik or a Shelwal, wich is as you know VERY baggy...now were they trying to make themselves look bigger down the belt

don't know may be
But seriously, this simply make sense, in a hot area, you need baggy clothes. Now you'll ask, well the women have so many layers, isn't that hotter? Yes, and this is when culture comes in play. In all cultures, men and women have needed to "hide" what is considered sexual.
Now the problem in our cultures is that every single cm of skin has been over-sexualized...so you can't show anything...and that's probably why women in our countries dress with layers...not very different from the european or american women even 50years ago.
_________________