




While many hypotheses have been advanced to connect the ethnic name 'Kurd' to that of the ancient Hurrian Qutils (Hallo, 1971) or the Khardukhoi (Carduchoi) of the Greek historian Xenophon (Cawkell, 1979), none have much merit. Whatever the roots, there is evidence to push the origin of the word 'Kurd' back at least to the early4th millennium BC, if not earlier. Even though I have not personally seen the term used by the old Mesopotamian sources, I was assured by my colleague Piotr Steinkeller, professor of Akkadian and Sumerian languages at Harvard University, of the accuracy of reports of such usage dating back 3800 years. The Akkadian term 'Kurtei' denoted an indeterminate portion or groups of inhabitants of the Zagros (and eastern Taurus) mountains. On the other hand, to their end in the 6th century BC, the Babylonians loosely (and apparently pejoratively) referred to almost everyone who lived in the Zagros-Taurus system a "Qutil," including the Medes! But Babylonian records also attest to many more specific subdivisional names such as the Mardi, Lullubi, Kardaka and Qardu, the last two of which have all been used frequently in the needless controversy over the roots and antiquity of the ethnic term 'Kurd' and the question of the presence of a general ethnic designator.






My biggest point i think you didnt answerd where is the first ethnic beginn of Kurds?

l. The earliest evidence thus far of a unified and distinct culture shared by the people inhabiting the Kurdish mountains relates to the period of the 'Halaf Culture' which emerged about 8000) years ago. Named for the ancient mound of Tel Halaf in what is uow Syrian Kurdistan (west of the town of Qamishli), this culture is best known for its easily recognizable style of pottery which, fortunately, was produced in abundance. Exquisitely painted, delicately designed Halaf pottery is easily distinguishable from earlier and later productions.

Of the language or ethnic affliation of the Ubaidians we know nothing beyond conjecture. However, it is they who gave the names Tigris and Euphrates to the rivers of Kurdistan and Mesopotamia, as well as the names of almost all of the cities we now recognize as Sumerian. The cultural impact of the Ubaidians on the mountain communities could have been vast, though apparently it was not particularly deep.

3. By approximately 4300 BC, a new culture, and possibly a new people, came to dominate the mountains: the Hurrians. Of the Hurrians we know much more, and the volume of our knowledge becomes greaterwith time. We know, for example, that the Hurrians spread far and wide into the Zagros-Taurus mountain systems and intruded for a time on the neighboring plains of Mesopotamia and the Iranian Plateau. However, they never expanded far from the mountains. Their economy was surprisingly integrated and focused, alongwith their political bonds, which ran generally parallel to the Zagros-Taurus mountains rather than radiating out to the lowlands, as was the case during the preceding Ubaid cultural period. Mountainplain economic exchanges remained secondaryin importance, judging by the archaeological remains of goods and their origins.
The Hurrians spoke a language or languages of the northeastern group of the Caucasian family of languages, distantly related to modern Lezgian and, by extension, to Georgian and Laz. The direction of their expansion is not yet understood and by no means should be taken as having been north-south, in other words, as an expansion out of the Caucuses. (It may well be that it was the Hurrians who introduced Caucasian languages into the Caucasus.)
For a long time the states founded by the Hurrians remained small, until around 2500 BC when larger political-military entities evolved out of the older city-states. Four polities are of special note: Urartu, Mushku, Subaru and Guti/Qutil. The kingdom of Mushku is nowbelieved to have brought about the final downfall of the Hittites in Anatolia. Their name survives in the city of Mush/Mus in north central Kurdistan of Turkey. The Subaru, who operated from the areas north of modern Arbil in central Kurdistan, have left their name in the populous and historic Kurdish tribal confederacy of Zubari, who still inhabit the areas north of Arbil. The name of Mount Ararat is a legacy of the Urartu. The Qutils of central and southern Kurdistan, after graduallyunifying the smaller mountain principalities, became strong enough in 2250 BC to actually annex Sumeria and the rest of lowland Mesopotamia. A Qutil dynasty ruled Sumeria for 130 years until 2120 BC.
Two legendary emporia, Melidi and Aratta, served the Hurrians in their inter-regional trade with the economies outside the mountains. With much certainty, Melidi is to be identified with modern Malatya, while Aratta is probably to be identified with the rich Qutil archaeological site of Godin Teppa near Kangawar in southern Kurdistan. By the middle of the 2nd millennium BC, the culture and people of Kurdistan appear to have been unified under a Hur- rian identity. The fundamental legacy of the Hurrians to the present culture of the Kurds is manifest in the realm of religion, mythology, martial arts, and even genetics. Nearly two-thirds of Kurdish tribal, topological and urban names are also likely of Hurrian origin: Buhtan, Talaban, Jelali, Barzan; Mardin, Ziwiya and Dinawar, to name a few. Mythological and religious symbols present in the art of the later Hurrian dynastics such as the Mannaeans of eastern Kurdistan, and the Lullus of the south, present in part what can still be observed in the Kurdish ancient religion of Yazdanism, better known today by its various denominations, such as Alevism, Yezidism, and Yar- sanism (Ahl-i Haqq).
It is fascinatingto recognize the origin of manytattooingmotifs still used by traditional Kurds to decorate their bodies as replicas of those which appear on Hurrian figurines. One such is the combination that incorporates serpent, sun disc, dog and comb motifs. In fact some of these Hurrian tattoo motifs are also present in the religious decorative arts of the Yezidi Kurds.

4. The portrait of a culturally homogenized Kurdistan was not to last. As early as 2000 BC, the vanguards of the Indo- European speaking tribal immigrants, such as the Hittites and Mittanis, had arrived in southwestern Asia. While the Hittites only marginally affected the mountain communities in Kurdis- tan, the Mittanis settled in Kurdistan and influenced the na- tives in several fields worthy of note, in particular the introduction of knotted rug weaving. Even rug designs intro- duced by the Mittanis and recognizable in Assyrian floor carv- ings remain the hallmark of Kurdish rugs and kelims. The modern mina-khani and chwar-such styles are basically the same as those the Assyrians depicted nearly 3000 years ago.
The Mittanis seem to have been an Indic, and not an Iranic group of people. Their pantheon, which includes names like Indra, Varuna, Suriya, Nasatya, is typically Indic. The Mittanis could have introduced during this early period some of the Indic tradition that appears to be manifest in the Kurdish religion of Yazdanism.
And lastly the Arians came: They were from South East Asia - India...The avalanche of Indo-European tribes, however, was to come about 1200 BC, raining havoc on the economy and settled culture in the mountains and lowlands alike. The north was settled by the Haiks, known to us as the Armenians, while the rest of the mountainsbecame targets of settlement for various Iranic peoples, such as the Medes, Persians, Scythians, Sar- mathians and Sagarthians (whose name survives in the name of the Zagros mountains).
By 850 BC, the last Hurrian states had been extinguished by the invading Aryans, whose sheer numbers of immigrants must have been considerable. They succeeded over time in chang- ing the Hurrian language(s) of the people in Kurdistan, as well as their genetic make-up. By the 3rd centuryBC, the Aryaniza- tion of the mountains was virtually complete.
When the ethnic Medes and Persians arrived on the eastern flanks of the Zagros around 1000 BC, a massive internal migra- tion from the northern and central Zagros toward the southern Zagros was in progress. By the 6th century BC, many large tribes which we now find among the Kurds were also present in the southern Zagros, in Fars and even Kirman. As early as the 3rd century BC, the 'Cyrtii' ('Kurti') are reportedby Greek, and later by Roman authors, to inhabit as much the southern (Persia or Pars/Fars) as the central and northern Zagros (Kur- distan proper). This was to continue for another millenium, when early Islamic sources also enumerate tens of Kurdish tribes in the southern Zagros. In time they were assimilated into the local populations. In fact, this has been a source of puzzlement for many modern writers who now find very few if any Kurds in the southern Zagros. Unaware of the history and extent of Kurdish historical migrations, they often draw the wrong conclusion: that the term 'Kurd' was not an ethnic name, but a designator of all nomads. This facile hypothesis is hardly worthy of refutation since no proof beyond a single, vague phrasc by a medieval writer, Hamza Isfahani, has never been produced to support it.
It is surprising to most that among the Kurds the Aryan cultural legacywas, and still remains secondary to that of the Hurrians. Culturally, Aryan nomads brought very little to add to what they found already present in the Zagros-Taurus region . As has always been the case, cultural sophistication and civilization are almost never associated with a nomadic way of life. In fact, nomads are traditionally thought to be destroyers of sedentary cultures, potential mortal adversaries in the struggle for pos- session of land and political dominance.
These Cultures are only the "big" cultures - there are MANY small cultures that were in and around Anatolia, Zagros and Taurus... So we have always been a part of these lands - just like Assyrians and Armenians we have lived in these areas for many thousand years...
Have a look at the "BIBLICAL MAP" Which was done by Romans - There you see it says "M E D" - That is "MEDYA" and it was the LAST Kurdish state - the Last Assyrian state was in Msopotamia and Northern Iraq---- > Medya and Babylon attacked Assyria - So Assyria was devided between Babylon and Medya in 612 BC... So since Kurds have permanently lived in Northern Iraq...
Medya (Sasanian Kings) fell when the Arabs came - in 7-8th century!One thing what is very sad if there wouldnt be killded so many assyrians and armeans i think the middle east map would look very diffrent.
Yes - Indeed!!! Then parts of Iraq and Syria would be ASSYRIA, Parts of Turkey and Azerbaijan would have been ARMENIA... But you know even if 5 million Assyrians have been genocided - Kurds were the majority population in all of South East Turkey... And they are still today...
My brother - many Kurds have been killed - by the MILLIONS! So if Kurds had been united in 1919 then Parts of Iran, Turkey, Iraq and Syria would be KURDISTAN...
You know - Everybody accepts that Armenians have been Genocided - that is good! But we must work to let people know about the Assyrian , Greek and Kurdish Genocides too... Millions of Greek, Assyrian and Kurds have been killed by the Turks... Also - Kurds have been killed by Iran, Syria and Iraq in large numbers...
That is why we must stand together... We have the same enemyWhat i wanted to say the turkish majority live in turkey can you tell me please if you know how much the Kurdish popultion have been before 80 years????
I realy don't know the exact number of people that lived then - but HALF of the Turkeys population was Kurdish - now millions have been assimilated, killed and forcefully moved! Today There are AT LEAST 18 million Kurds in Turkey - Istanbul has ca 4 million Kurds! Kurds are the majority of the population in 24 Turkish Provinces, in 7 Iranian Provinces, in 4 in Iraq with 30-40 % in Diyala and Ninawa provinces... There are 40 million Kurds in the world!But you guys have to thing is this makeable or isnt it not should we look at one place and work for there for an Kurdistan.
- Yes - We are asking for VERY MUCH!
You are right... But we are only fighting for "ALL OR NOTHING"... So we want ALL Kurdish majority areas in Kurdistan... You know - the treaty of Sèvres said that Kurdistan was an autonomous region in Turkey - But if you go to the Armenian thread in the other forum you will see that that region was VERY small...
TO our friendship my people yours and my armenian brothers have always lived good together just the turkish people did make this hate and fight between uns and that is still so they try to make us fight against eachother cause they know if we get one hand they will loose all what they have build well lets say all what they have stolen cause if we see it in the true way turkey is part of greece, kurdistan, armeania and assyria
Yes - We have one common enemy... We have had a long lasting friendship and brotherhood... There have been many intermarriges between us before... But now as you say - our enemies want to make war between us! Turkey will FALL! And then we will all share and divide the land between us!
You know - Turkey is the real thief - they have stolen our culture, dances, songs, clothes and culture and they dare to say that it IS TURKISH!
cause i know kurdish have married before more wifes and had alot of children god make them not less i hope.
Hehehe![]()
![]()
Yes before most Kurds had 2-4 wives - they had 10-20 children and they had BIG families
Today there are 40 million Kurds- So I am glad we have had that culture - My grandfather on my mothers side had three wives and about 15 children
Mashallah!
And what i think that this all became arabic cause arabs are stupid people the european did let kill us cause we have been to smar and we wouldnt give our oil so fast and for free or cheap all this fuckin oil has made so many people sad its the black death i like to say.



Rumtaya wrote:Yes i know that too i think the assyrians and armenians have the best friendshipt but how it is now i dont know.
but like i said i know some assyrians who married to armenian and i know armenian married to assyrians.
do you guys have dolma lool yes i think maybe you call it also so
tell me some food names armenian


.The greatest leaders in the last two areas were General Agha Petros who corresponded with Andranik Pasha and Mar Benyamin Shimun, Catholicos-Patriarch of the Church of the East, who was assassinated by a Kurdish chieftain in March 1918




sorry if i said that stupid and foolish kurds
the assyrian patriach
about that story i heard our patriach was going to talk to some kurdish fighter or so and as he wanted to go back from visit they shoot him infront of the door.




Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot]