Page 1 of 1

What would make Iran better.

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:41 pm
Author: Darkseid
I have been pondering, reading, and observing a lot of material and now I have found a governmental formula that would insure better success for Iran.

By the way this is written in manuscript form, because if I proceed into too much detail specifically what it is about I could bore you to death with rhetorical information. So instead, I'll give you a manuscript and see what you think needs to be changed or defined more clearly.

Country = Iran

Government = Federal Theocratic Republic with Five Branches

Executive = Semi-Presidential.

Head of State = President, foreign and military executive head. Elected by the people upon popular vote.

Head of Government = Prime Minister, domestic executive head. Elected by the lowest house of legislation and nominated by the president.

Legislative = Tricameral

Lowest House = Chamber of Deputies (Popular representation, each deputy represents a specific number of people with an additional deputy for any additional ammount of people. To be specific there should be less than 1000, but more than 200 deputies to represent the entire country in terms of popular representation)

Middle House = Chamber of Censors (Theocratic representation, each censor represents a specific Shi'a clergy foundation or mosque. The censors do not have the power to make legislation, but they do have the power to end disputes between the Deputies and the Senators upon which of the two they favor and they can pass legislation made by other house that has yet to be presented to the other house of legislation. If a bill was made by the deputies, it can pass by approval by the censors without going into the senate and vice versa with a bill made by the Senate.)

Upper House = Chamber of Senators or Senate (Regional representation, each set of senators represents a region in Iran). The Senators can make legislation like the Deputies, but not for the budget and other instances that solely depend on domestic jurisdiction. There should be a set of senators from each region representing popular vote, a set of senators from each region representing state legislatures (like South Africa), and a set of senators from each region representing minorities of each state (either ethnic, gender, religious, or disability minority). This would allow Sunnis, Jews, Christians, and such to openly participate in a theocratic institution without taking over the entire government, which would insure that Iran remains a shiite country without entirely pissing off everyone else.

Judicial Branch = Elective and Independent Judicial that is founded off of the different practices of laws. There should be a set number of individuals that become justices base on these differences in law interpretation. The head justice should be base off of international law, but may be bounded to just the Shiite faith to keep the country primarily Shiite in Judicial matters while still pleasing the international community by abiding to international peace and law. The Chief Justice is nominated by the President with approval by the Senate and elected by Regional Vote across the entire country (each state has one vote and the one with the most votes wins, if there is a tie then the election is recasted or broken by a vote from the Senate). The other Justices could simply be voted into office by the Senate with approval from the Censors.

Electorial Branch = A minor branch of government that simply tallies up votes for the electorial process of electing government positions. The individuals for this role should be appointed into their position by the national government with local approval.

Constitutional Branch = A minor branch of government that insures the protection of the people from the abuse of the government. This is where the Supreme Leader should reside. The Supreme Leader must be a cleric of the Shiite community and a descendent of Muhammad. The Supreme Leader's power resides in with the people to check the other branches to insure prosperity and prevent corruption. The Supreme Leader can be removed from office if the Justices and the Censors find him too corrupt to be a true descendent of Muhammad. Like he was a descendent of Muhammad, but his bloodline became too deluted. The likely event that the Censors and Justices agree to dismissing the Supreme Leader is going to be highly rare and unlikely at any event that the Supreme Leader isn't guilty of corruption. The Censors are the ones that elect the Supreme Leader and the Justices nominate the Supreme Leader.

The is just the Iranian Federal government.

Iran's regions would be divided into smaller regions presenting a similar government to the overall federal government. This would continue dividing into smaller and smaller regions until you come to the individual neighborhoods, tribes, or communities.

PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 2:45 pm
Author: K4L_2007
interesting thoughts

PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 8:21 pm
Author: Darkseid
Image

Image

Image

Iran should be divided into the following states...

:Iranian States:

1) Persia - Persian People
2) Balochistan - Baloch People
3) Luristan - Lur People
4) Tajikistan - Tajik People
5) Talyishia - Talysh People
6) Hazarastan - Hazara People
7) Gilakistan - Gilaki People
8 ) Mazandaran - Mazandarani People
9) Kurdisia - The Kurdistan in the North-Eastern area of Iran, not the Kurdistan of the West between Iran, Turkey, Syria, and Iraq.
10) Qashqaistan - Qashqai people
11) Azerbaijan - Azerbaijani people
12) Hormozgan - Hormozgani people (Arabic)
13) Farsiwanistan - Farsiwani people
14) Pashtostan - Pashto People
15) Lakistan - Laki people
16) Bashkardistan - Bashkardi people
17) Pashaistan - Pashai people
18 ) Nuristan - Nuristani people
19) Qizilbashistan - Qizilbash People
20) Badakhshan - Badakhstani People

Anyother future states would be considered.

The Kurdish Area of the West is to secede in becoming a part of Kurdistan.
The Arab Area of the West is to secede in becoming a part of Arabistan with the Shiite Arabs of Iraq.

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:10 am
Author: Diri
Darkseid - are you Kurdish?

I forgot where you're from...


Either way - the Leks are Kurds...

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:56 pm
Author: Darkseid
Diri wrote:Darkseid - are you Kurdish?

I forgot where you're from...


Either way - the Leks are Kurds...


The Leks? (That is albanian currency) Do they call themselves Kurds? Or do other Kurds call them Kurds?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_lek

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:42 pm
Author: Diri
Darkseid wrote:
Diri wrote:Darkseid - are you Kurdish?

I forgot where you're from...


Either way - the Leks are Kurds...


The Leks? (That is albanian currency) Do they call themselves Kurds? Or do other Kurds call them Kurds?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_lek



:lol:

No Kurdên Lekî... I didn't mean the Albanian money... ;)

I meant Leks - as in Northern Lors...

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:24 pm
Author: Darkseid
Diri wrote:
Darkseid wrote:
Diri wrote:Darkseid - are you Kurdish?

I forgot where you're from...


Either way - the Leks are Kurds...


The Leks? (That is albanian currency) Do they call themselves Kurds? Or do other Kurds call them Kurds?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_lek



:lol:

No Kurdên Lekî... I didn't mean the Albanian money... ;)

I meant Leks - as in Northern Lors...


Well maybe you should allow the Lords to make their own state like the Zazas and then allow them to decide base on popular appeal (Voting) to see if they want to join Kurdistan.

But don't take on any offense if the Zazas decide to join the Anatolian Federation (once I'm done with Turkey) or if the Northern Lors decide to join the Iranian Federation.

People have to be free to make their own decisions, we have to respect their wishes, but we can influence them by setting a good example.