First things first:
GREECE IS GREECE - KURDISTAN IS KURDISTAN...
Greece has historical claim to Constantinopel (Istanbul in turkish). You all heard of TROY??? Well that is located just south of Constantinopel...
And actually ANKYRA (Ankara in turkish) was GREEK!
Kurdistan startes with the Pontus range of mountains. The Pontus are located east of Ankyra - So - towns like Chorum, Amasya, Tokat, Yozgat, Zile and Sêwas are originally and HISTORICALLY Kurdish.
Kassem
besides I would be concerned if istanbul turned greek, the greeks are known not to care much for the rights of their muslim minorities, and we have lots of kurdish brother and sisters there...
What are you saying? Constantinopel turn Greek? You need to read your history - It was forced to be Turkish by the turks... Don't you know that the (damn what was it called?) their religious CENTER fromed around Constantinopel-- It was theirs before the Turks came from their GOd forsaken Mongolia... WHY DO you support those FAROFF Turks and not the GREEK??? At least the GREEK can give you an alliance... YOU COULDN*T trust Turkey to be a future ally of Kurdistan...
And FRANKLY - The Greek are VERY tolerant - TELL him Vladimir - you should know!!!
we also need to get bodrum kurds love going to bodrum in vacations
EXCUSE ME???? What??? HELLO!
Damn I hate Bodrum really.... but it's very popular and good for tourism in Kurdistan
WE DON*T NEED IT - Kurdistan IS overloaded with articats and sunny places--- AND most people are tourists to SEE something... not to snooze on the beach all day long...
so you prefer antalya, or what? dam' this is SO damaging that kurdistan doesn't have any access to the sea... that's what killing us, because even if we had the whole of kurdistan independant tomorrow, unless we have good relations with turkey or syria, we would have no access to water...
Pardon my expression - but this SHOULD prove your knowledge on Kurdistans extensive geography... I wish I could attatch a MAP for you to see - So I wouldn't need to explain - BUT- Kurdistan DOES have acces to the ocean... WE need not have ANY relation with neither turk nor syrian... We have (the most strategic one) Îskenderûn and by the map that was given to the UN in 1946 we ALSO have acces to the ocean in the south to the Persian Gulf... I will lay out maps when I get home...
another problem if we were ever to set up an independant kurdistan in the north, with an unfriendly turkey, is the up to 10 million kurds who now reside in turkish historical areas... they would most likely get slaughtered... this issue is really hard.
Yet again - Well - Obviously there are MANY Kurds in "historically" turkish land... (It is HISTORICALLY GREEK!) BUT - What the HELL would Kurds be doing in Turkey if there was a Kurdistan??? Of course th Kurdish government must make it attractive for them to move to Kurdistan - and even - WE ALL KNOW THAT ALL KURDS (The ones that wanted to) Could move to Kurdistan EASLEY with NO problems what so ever... so what is your point? If they are KURDs they will move - or they can choose to live in Turkey... Or move to Chicken for all I care...
yeah but the problem is, the crowd would slaughter the kurds... hostage trade is only possible with governments... in the end I think both would get slaughtered which is not an acceptable solution
in the end I think if all our demands that are a condition to turkish EU accession are met ( education in the mother tongue kurdish, general unconditional amnesty for all the guerillas, the right to engage in political pro-separatist activities... ), we would have all the legal grounds needed to work out independance by the way of politics. but is EU willing to listen to our demands and make sure they're implemented? not sure... and are turks gonna accept them... even less sure. an amnesty for all the guerillas would mean Öcalan has to be released too. unlikely, eh?
Are you enjoying FANTASYLAND???
When I get Home I'll post MAPS and We all can compare and discuss... Which one should we persue--- That would be the REAL question...











