jjmuneer wrote:Georgians aren't Aryans. Kurdish indo-european ancestry comes from mostly Median and Scythian with the some possible parthian influence in the south-east. And Medes weren't "Native" to Kurdistan.
Do you have any primary sources for Kurds are Sumerian descended?
thesunchild wrote:Please don’t believe in lies and propaganda on internet. We Kurds are Umman Manda , Medians (children of god) and native to Kurdistan (Media). Ancient Medians (Aryans) were also native to Kurdistan.
The thing is that we Kurds are a little bit mixed with the Semitic females from the Levant (Jews) and Arabia (Chaldeans).
We are Aryans, children of the great Medes and we are native to Kurdistan!
Kurdsta wrote:jjmuneer wrote:Georgians aren't Aryans. Kurdish indo-european ancestry comes from mostly Median and Scythian with the some possible parthian influence in the south-east. And Medes weren't "Native" to Kurdistan.
Do you have any primary sources for Kurds are Sumerian descended?
I never stated that Georgians were aryans I said they are Eastern Europeans. No they come from aryan tribes that have settled in various parts of Kurdistan. In India, Tibet, Iran, Afghanistan and Kurdistan their is signs of aryan "invaders". This proves they have migrated from where their home land is thought to be (modern day Ukraine) and have had 2 major migrations one going through Asia and back to Kurdistan and one going through Kurdistan to Iran.
Medes are a unification of 6 Kurdish tribes, the Medes formed a state under king diako and ruled over Persian, Parthians e.t.c. It clearly states that in my 2nd paragraph.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=arya ... sVRwp_aI2M:
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=arya ... JVnaBDvYrM:
Their isn't many primary sources but if you know your history well enough you can find Sumerian elements everywhere in Kurdistan. Hawler for example it was built by the natives (ubaids then formed to Sumerians) its real name is ur bilum. It has always been a Kurdish city has it not? Urmieh once again Ur means city. We know Ur was the capital of sumeria. Ararat comes from Urartu the kingdom of wan. K ur d once again ur. Look at Gobekli tepe and compare their reliefs to of the Sumerians they are very similar. Evidence is everywhere the median reliefs/depiction are based upon Sumerians. Awesta the oldest known Kurdish language was written in cuneiform.
Ill ty and find a primary source but it speaks for itself.
thesunchild wrote:No, you're spreading lies!
We have nothing to do with the Summerians, Aryans were not the invaders. Original Aryans came from Arya-Veya, the original homeland of the Aryans and it was in the mountains of Kurdistan.
The Medes were native to Kurdistan.
Chaldeans came from the south, Arabia and the Levant. They were Semitic folks and belonged to hg. J1 & E.
Kurdsta wrote:https://www.google.com.au/search?q=sumerian+sun+disk&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari#biv=i|1;d|Y-Pcv0MRPZvA1M: this is exactly frawahar
jjmuneer wrote:But since you insist, J1* is actually non-semitic, actually found in quite of Kurds, and the caucasus. You forget R1a-z93, which is actually the indo-iranian marker, seems to be high in central asia than Kurdistan.
thesunchild wrote:jjmuneer wrote:But since you insist, J1* is actually non-semitic, actually found in quite of Kurds, and the caucasus. You forget R1a-z93, which is actually the indo-iranian marker, seems to be high in central asia than Kurdistan.
I've seen proffesional autosomal DNA result and according to that kurds have the most of so the called ''Persian" component.
Other autosomal results by amateur bloggers are bullshit.
Semitic subclade of J1-something together with hg. E was part of the original Semites. Kurds have low percentage of hg. R1a because we have some of hg. 'I'. without hg. 'I' we would have higher percentage of R1a.
Also Aryans were mostly J2a & R1a folks, not only R1a.
It means nothing that R1a is higher in Central Asia than in Kurdistan. R1b is also higher in Europe than in West Asia, but R1b is still from West Asia.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]