Kurdeki Neteweyi

The Sasanids stolen Kurdish heritage
Before proceeding, certain terminological distinctions should be made clear:
The term “Pahlawani” represents an endonym historically used by Kurdish-speaking populations, while “Pahlavi” functions as an exonym primarily associated with Persian historiography.
In this discussion, the exonym “Pahlavi” will be used for clarity, since it remains the more widely recognized term in scholarly and international discourse. However, it is important to acknowledge that the conventional understanding of “Pahlavi” derives from Persian reinterpretations of what originally have been Kurdish linguistic and cultural tradition associated with the Sasanian era.
The Sasanian Language and Historical Sources:
It is broadly accepted among historians and linguists that the Sasanian dynasty used a language referred to as Pahlavi. This language appears in several historical inscriptions and literary works from the period, including Kār-nāmag ī Ardašīr ī Pābakān. The 8th-century scholar Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ (born Ruzbeh), who translated many Sasanian texts into Arabic, explicitly distinguished Pahlavi from Parsi (Middle Persian), identifying them as two separate languages. Although Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ was ethnically Persian and his native tongue was Parsi - he was very skilled, some claim fluent, in Pahlavi (see source) which he used in his translations, such as the now-lost Xwadāy-nāmag.
According to Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ’s own statements, the Pahlavi language was primarily spoken in northwestern Iran—a region historically and demographically associated with Kurdish populations rather than Persian ones. This geographic observation suggests that Pahlavi not only belonged to the northwestern branch of the Iranian language family by linguistics, but also belonged to kurdish inhabited areas geographically. Distinct from the southwestern branch, to which Persian language belongs.
Linguistic Classification and Historical Reinterpretation:
Prior to the 19th century, linguistic scholarship often classified Pahlavi as a dialect of Parthian, a clearly northwestern Iranian language—the same branch to which modern Kurdish belongs. This implies that the Sasanian linguistic tradition was rooted in the northwestern (kurdish) rather than southwestern (persian) Iranian group.
However, during the early 19th century, particularly following the Persian Constitutional Revolution (1905–1911) and the rise of nationalist historiography, Persian intellectuals and their Western counterparts increasingly sought to reinterpret Iran’s ancient past as ethnically and linguistically Persian. This ideological shift entailed redefining Pahlavi as “Middle Persian,” effectively rebranding the Sasanian cultural and linguistic kurdish heritage as Persian rather than Kurdish or Parthian in origin.
Comparative Linguistic Evidence:
A comparison of key lexical items across Sasanian Pahlavi, modern Kurdish (Pahlawani/Pehlewani), and modern Persian reveals notable phonological and lexical continuities between Pahlavi and modern Pehlawani, while having significant divergence from persian. For example:
- Sasanids Pahlavi:
Good night > Shaw xwaš
God > Xwãda
Language > uzwan
Land of Aryans > Ērān
Good evening > Ewarag xwaš
Good > Xwaš
Modern kurdish Pahlawani:
Good Night > Shaw xwaš
God > Xwãda
Language > zwan
Land of Aryans > Ērān
Good evening > Ewara Xwaš
Good > Xwaš
Meanwhile persian:
Good Night > Shab bakhir
God > Xûda
Language > Zaban
Land of Aryans > Iran
Good evening > Asr bakhir
Good > Khoob
Historical Consequences of Reinterpretation:
Following the consolidation of Persian national identity in the 19th century, many aspects of Iran’s pre-Islamic history— including the Sasanian Empire’s language, culture, and territorial designations—were subsumed under a unified “Persian” framework. Even the term Ērānšahr (“Land of the Aryans”), historically pronounced Ērān in Sasanian and Kurdish usage, came to be Irān according to the Persian phonological system - which differs from Pahlavi/Kurdish.
Summary:
In summary, linguistic, historical, and geographic evidence collectively indicate that the Sasanian Pahlavi language shared fundamental affinities with northwestern Iranian languages, notably Kurdish, rather than with southwestern Persian. If the Persian language indeed derived some aspects of its lexicon or structure from the northwestern language such as Pahlawi/Pahlawani, this would imply a process of linguistic assimilation and reinterpretation rather than direct continuity. Consequently, modern Persian is seen as a distinct southwestern Iranian language that has incorporated substantial lexical and structural elements from both Arabic (50%) and northwestern sources such as kurdish pehlewani.
Therefore the term ”middle-persian” applied on the kurdish Pahlavi / Pahlaw / Pahlawani language is a blatant historical falsefication regarding the Sasanids Pahlavi language which was a northwestern language and not an ancestral persian language.
According to Ibn Muqaffa, the only language that could be classified as ”middle-persian” is the language called Parsi. One language can’t be derived from two different languages and therefore both Pahlavi and Parsi, who where 2 different languages, can not be classified as ”middle-persian”.
”Were the Sasanids persians?”
No. Due to authentic evidence the Sasanids spoke a different language from modern persian and the only language that linguistically can be regarded as the continuiation of the Sasanids Pahlavi language/dialect is the modern kurdish dialect of Pahlawani. The statement from Ibn Muqaffa in the 8th century regarding the geographic location of the Pahlavi speakers further strenghtens that kurdish Pahlawani dialect is the only continuiation of the Pahlawi/Pahlawani language.
Therefore, Sasanids language should not be regarded as the ancestor of persian language since the ancestor of persian language is Parsi. Not Pahlavi.
Further, the Sasanid themselves shouldn’t be regarded as persians since the sasanid language/dialect was a northwestern dialect - just as modern kurdish is.
Pahlaw / Pahlawi / Pahlawani:
To understand the Southern Kurdish dialect of Pahlawani is to understand Kurdish history – beyond the political falsefications created by persians.
Selected References:
- * Encyclopaedia Iranica, “Pahlavi Language” (E. Yarshater)
* D. N. MacKenzie, Kurdish Dialect Studies I–II (1961–62)
* V. Minorsky, Kurdish Dialects and Literature (1943)
* G. L. Windfuhr, The Iranian Languages (2009)
* O. Mann, Kurdische Studien (1906)
* Kār-nāmag ī Ardašīr ī Pābagān (Sasanian period text)
* Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ (Ruzbeh): biographical entries, IRCO & Encyclopaedia Iranica
* Ethnic Groups in Iran (University of Cologne; CIA Demographic Map)









