Ridiculous Armenophile article on Kurds in Armenian Genocide

[Azamat]

I found this article published by Asian Times:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ16Ak02.html

It portrays us as the main aggressors during the Armenian Genocide. I acknowledge the participation of Kurdish Hamidiye irregulars and convicted criminals, but this article throws it way out of proportion. The Kurdish involvement in the genocide was negligible compared to the amount of killing that was done by the Turks, but the writer seems invert that, turning it into a delusional fairytale, which makes his article in favor of the Armenians and should be considered Armenophile. Another thing that irritates me is the article's perception of Kurdish/Armenian inhabitance in the region. The writer seems to be totally ignorant of the fact that we, being the main descendants of the Hurrians, have a genetical continuity in eastern anatolia that preceeds the Armenians by at least a millenium. Therefore we have our sole right to these lands, and the Armenians can come about as much ancient kingdoms as they want(which were very violent in nature and it's territories should be considered conquests), but won't change our vast Hurrian ancestry.

In my opinion, this article totally unnuanced and Armenophile. The statements made by the writer are complete bullshit, and he clearly does not realise how revolting it is to have your nation accused of the killing of 1/1.5 million people. A significant anti-Kurdish sentiment has been developing among the Armenians, and now their filth has spread to the entire world. I'm totally disgusted by their claims on ancient Kurdish land and their ridiculous portrayance of Kurds and the Kurdish participation in their genocide. When Turkey acknowledges its genocidal past, Armenian nationalism/irredentism will become the main hindrance to the Kurdish cause.