Author: Dilsad » Sat Apr 29, 2006 8:05 pm
Hi Fortuna,
I understand...and I wasn't trying to belittle your exprience and feelings specially since you were there the week prior to the bombings.
I just feel a little bit defensive each time I hear :
"oh those bombing in the "fill in the blank", at least us in europe or the west we're not like them..."
And I understand that wasn't what you were saying either...but I just want to remind "westerners" or "northerners" that europe did not see more than 30-50 years of peace in a row...that is all out war...while keeping a low level war for almost its entire existence:
This past century alone:
WWI, WWII, Bosnia, Serbia, Corse, Northern Ireland, Basque Country, Portugal/Spain dictatorships and add all the colonial wars to that and the 20th century looked like a big fucking war zone...
No to asnwer you question, about suicide bombers...
Ok, in Islam suicide is forbidden..that's the first no no for suicide bombers
There are rules of war:
You can't burn trees, property, kill civilians etc...
But obviously, these people are not doing that for islam per say, islam is used as a tool, similar to nationalism which has been used and is still used to justify killing of civilians.
On top of that, for a lot of people, the term "innocent civilians" fell in a grey area:
Let me explain...
During colonial time, were the white farm and land owners a part of the colonial and occupying forces? Or were they simply civiilans trying to make a living.
In Palestine, are the religious fanatic settlers part of the israeli occupation tool?
In Iraqi-occupied-Kurdistan, were the arabs (shia and sunni) a part of Saddam's arabization, or were they poor people trying to make a living where they got some help from their governement...
In Egypt are the tourist supporting a corupt governement...
This is why it is also very easy for a lot of people to justify kiling civilians...if you see them as your enemie, you remove any humanity from them...and the become "fair game"....
Dilsad...