Facebook
Search
Welcome To Roj Bash Kurdistan
Capitalism, Socialism, or in between?
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Author: Shalaw » Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:39 pm
well everything has its limits... as in you can't tell a person you are gonna be poor and you will be rich.. or all of you will be equal, but yeah it has its advantages 
-
Shalaw - Nubar
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:50 pm
- Location: Big CO
- Highscores: 0
- Arcade winning challenges: 0
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Author: Vladimir » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:32 pm
None of them. Somebody has got to be orignal. 
The suppression of ethnic cultures and minority religious groups in attempting to forge a modern nation were not unique to Turkey but occurred in very similar ways in its European neighbours - Bruinessen.
-
Vladimir - Shaswar
- Posts: 2036
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 10:31 am
- Highscores: 0
- Arcade winning challenges: 0
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Nationality: Hispanic
Author: Diri » Tue May 24, 2005 12:24 pm
Shalaw
i voted for the same as you... I think it is important to have a balance... Here in Norway I have been voting for "Socialist Left"--- They are as the name says socialist... Only reason I do this is because I like their pollicy and because it is important to have a balance - if everybody else would vote for that party I would vote somethign else... just for the sake of having a strong opposition.. And thus creating democratic regimes... the MUST cooperate for them to build a government...
I agree with Medya however - BUT with ONE difference... I would much ratehr like people who make their money and become rich on their own have less tax than people who inherite the money... Easy money should be HIGHLY taxed...
i voted for the same as you... I think it is important to have a balance... Here in Norway I have been voting for "Socialist Left"--- They are as the name says socialist... Only reason I do this is because I like their pollicy and because it is important to have a balance - if everybody else would vote for that party I would vote somethign else... just for the sake of having a strong opposition.. And thus creating democratic regimes... the MUST cooperate for them to build a government...
I agree with Medya however - BUT with ONE difference... I would much ratehr like people who make their money and become rich on their own have less tax than people who inherite the money... Easy money should be HIGHLY taxed...
-
Diri - Shaswar
- Posts: 6517
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:59 am
- Location: Norway
- Highscores: 0
- Arcade winning challenges: 0
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- Nationality: Kurd
Author: Vladimir » Tue May 24, 2005 4:24 pm
That's a very good idea Diri, but I think this will never happen.
The suppression of ethnic cultures and minority religious groups in attempting to forge a modern nation were not unique to Turkey but occurred in very similar ways in its European neighbours - Bruinessen.
-
Vladimir - Shaswar
- Posts: 2036
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 10:31 am
- Highscores: 0
- Arcade winning challenges: 0
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Nationality: Hispanic
Author: Diri » Tue May 24, 2005 5:05 pm
Perhaps it is so Vladimir... But in a way they COULD monitor such things.. I mean - They do register when a person dies... and then in their will they have written that they proclaim their belongings as given to "name" and so on... SO they may tax this type of money...
But thats just in theory - i am sure thing would end bad if it was implemented...
But thats just in theory - i am sure thing would end bad if it was implemented...
-
Diri - Shaswar
- Posts: 6517
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:59 am
- Location: Norway
- Highscores: 0
- Arcade winning challenges: 0
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- Nationality: Kurd
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]