Absolutely not. I knew that the murder should be someone that the victims knew, because of the structure of the office ( I know the place very well). It could be a double agent working for foreign services in a certain aim (Iran or Syria). Il also could be a problem of black money : Sakine Cansız could have discovered some irregularities in the financial transfers or was a troublemaker for a corrupted network.
At this time, Ömer Güney was not arrested. When it happened ,my theory that the murderer was a well known person in CIK was true. Then I waited for more informations about his personality and who was behind him (obviously he is not a serious agent).
But I have not still worked seriously about that case (I was busy to write something else). At mid-february I read all the things concerning the facts of the murders, and I begin to doubt of the real political motives :
1/ at first killing Sakine Cansız could not stop the process of negotiations. She was not important. Since many years she was nothing in the military decisions in Qandil and had not diplomatic functions in Europe as it seems. She was a 'legendary' figure but not an key in politics. And de facto, her death did not change anything in the negotiations. If some people wanted to ruin the process by murdering someone, it would be easier to kill an important Kurdish politician in Turkey instead of infiltrate during 2 years the Parisian CIK and waiting for a hazardous visit of Cansız (as she lived in Germany why they did not send someone to kill her in Germany ?).
If the PPK would have killed her, they did it when she was in Qandil last summer.
2/ I realized that every one have supposed immediately that Sakine Cansız was the main target because she was the most important. But nothing can prove it at 100%. And the one who was shot with 4 bullets (one in the mouth, as for being sure she was dead) was Fidan Doğan ; and she was the one that Güney knew really. So perhaps she was the main target ( I am not sure, but it might be).
3/ The personality of Güney : he did not claim to be the killer (as Hrant Dink's one for example) and claimed proudly to the police he is from PKK (that's not true, but he wanted to believe it) ; he came willingly to the police office when they summoned him ; he is mentally insane, has brain cancer and is an official disabled person (he got an income from French State for he can not work) ; another interesting fact : he is an amnesic.
So he could be the murderer and in that case, he did it for mysterious insane reasons (and I wait for more psychiatric experts' reports) ; or he was manipulated (by which people ?).
I've written all that thoughts but in French unfortunately for you :
http://sohrawardi.blogspot.fr/2013/02/l ... t-ils.html(Now Öcalan seems to charge Gülen 's men. I don't see how he could be more aware than other people, as he lives as a prisoner, but Gülen is his main target in the long Imralı leak published in Milliyet)
, and if you want to track my turkishness sources, I could add that originally that report is a leak published in Milliyet (100% Turkish) BUT no BDP lawyers did contest the veracity of these talking. I suppose they would have done if it was lies, and before posting it I waited for their reactions. At the contrary they only swore that they are not the authors of the leak.
